|
|
It is an
epidemic problem in academe, written up in the international press and
bemoaned by many. Grade inflation is a scourge in education. Nowhere is
it more in evidence than in private instruction studios in music
schools and conservatories where an “A” grade is the norm and some
teachers virtually grade all students pro-forma.
In talking about a student who was by a professor’s own account, “not
really cutting it” the professor defended the student “A” as a “mercy”
grade. But what could possibly be more unmerciful than to give a
student a false sense of security through an inflated grade? How
can an institution possibly advise a student that they are unlikely to
succeed in the profession, while giving the student top grades?
The roots of much of the grade inflation problem can be found in two
underlying systemic issues. The first one is enrollment needs:
specifically the fleshing out of programs and the money generated by
enrollment. The second problem is personal ignorance and laziness on
the part of instructors, and institutional laziness propagated by
administrators who are steeped in an enabling culture.
When students enroll at music schools they are, among other things,
fulfilling the needs of the institution’s programs. This routinely
taints the audition process, wherein a thin spot in a particular area
of the orchestra, and a dearth of suitable applicants can cause
enrollment offers to be made to candidates who have little or no chance
of vocational success with their chosen major. Once the student is
admitted, the next problem becomes a professor's unwillingness to "rock
the boat" with appropriate low grades for a student's output, combined
with institutional unwillingness to appropriately deal with the fact
that admittance for the student was a mistake. The prevailing
sensibility is often to simply usher the student through matriculation,
babying them through juries and recitals, inflating grades, and finally
sending them on their way with many tens of thousands of dollars of
student loan debt and a useless degree.
In current academic culture there is a steep penalty incurred by
professors and administrators who grade realistically, hold a hard
line, and push for the kind of consistent standards by which students
can measure their success toward professional efficacy as opposed to
matriculation. Within the prevailing culture at most schools today,
tough professors and administrators are often branded as “unfair” or
“hard-asses” by students, parents, and fellow faculty and
administrators, when in fact they are simply doing their jobs with
integrity by giving appropriate and important information to the
students. Conversely, professors and administrators who enable students
with inflated grades and spongy learning environments, make no waves,
and are rewarded with smiles, glad-handing and congratulations from a
system that seems to have adopted the notion of academe as a retailer
of services. In this system the student and parent of the student is
regarded as the consumer, and the administrators take the view that the
“consumer” is always right.
The goal in any training institution should be to give the student the
necessary tools to survive in the world in their chosen vocation. The
skills developed at the point of matriculation should correspond to
professional viability. Grades along the way should reflect a student's
progress toward ultimate viability. To do otherwise is to abuse the
trust implicit in the student/teacher/institution relationship. Along
the way some students will inadvertently be admitted inappropriately;
it is not possible to vet a prospective student's ultimate ability to
progress toward viability with a 100% success rate. It is the
responsibility of the private instructor and the institution to
recognize a student's lack of viability as early as possible in the
educational process, and to direct students toward areas of study where
they have a reasonable chance of becoming vocationally viable.
The all too common "take-the-money" and graduate them along system is
reprehensible but unfortunately shows no sign of abatement. ###
Stefan Hersh
Stefan Hersh is a violinist who
teaches at Roosevelt University's Chicago College of Performing
Arts
|
|
Final Exam
A professor stood before his class of twenty
senior students, about to hand out the final exam. "I want to say that
it's been a pleasure teaching you this semester. I know you've all
worked extremely hard and many of you are off to graduate school after
summer. So that no one gets their GPA messed up because they might have
been celebrating a bit too much this week, anyone who would like to opt
out of the final exam today will receive a 'B' for the course."
There was much rejoicing in the class as
students got up, walked to the front of the class, and took the
professor up on his offer. As the last taker left the room, the
professor looked out over the handful of remaining students and asked,
"Anyone else? This is your last chance."
One final student rose up and opted out of the
final. The professor closed the door and took attendance of those still
remaining. "I'm glad to see you believe in yourselves," he said. "You
all get 'A's."
from www.basicjokes.com
|
|